Sentence examples for this view claims from inspiring English sources

On this view, claims about logical form are evaluative, and such claims are underdetermined by the totality of facts concerning speakers' dispositions to use language.

This view claimed to be based on the historical Jesus, but scholars could not agree on the details.

This view, claim (a) in particular, is threatened by cases in which the reliability of the diagrammatic thinking is demonstrated non-visually.

Bergson (1914) echoes this view, claiming that dreams of flying or floating occur when we become aware, while dreaming, that our feet are not touching the ground.

Those who support this view claim that it is very difficult to make general statements about the 'impact' of a technology in some general terms.

In all the give and take, it is seldom noticed that defenders of this view claim to be carrying the Darwinian flag (Gayon 1998 and Gould 2003 are exceptions).

PC Zone agreed with this view, claiming that although the game looked impressive, it took a by-the-numbers approach towards the real-time strategy genre in a "mindless sort of way", concluding that "in no way is it anywhere near the game we hoped for".

(Calabrese and Baldwin 2003a, p. 188) Some proponents of this view claim hormesis is an adaptive, broadly generalizable phenomenon and argue that in the absence of contradictory information, the default assumption for risk assessments should be that at low exposures, toxic chemicals induce stimulatory effects (Calabrese and Baldwin 2003a).

This British view claims that Ranavalona deliberately allowed the plot to unfold almost to its conclusion in order to ascertain the loyalties of her members of government.

For instance, there is the classical stance of strong reduction, claiming that all mental states and properties can be reduced to the material domain (materialism) or even to physics (physicalism).[3] This point of view claims that it is both necessary and sufficient to explore and understand the material domain, e.g., the brain, in order to understand the mental domain, e.g., consciousness.

Paul Rusnock (Rusnock 2004) has argued provocatively against this common view, claiming that because of his lack of technical sophistication, Kant did not have the resources to develop a philosophically interesting account of mathematical practice, and so that his philosophy of mathematics is inadequate even in light of its historical context.