Many social scientists reject this second claim.
The general principle behind this second claim is 'same proximate cause, same immediate effect'.
It is possible to believe in temporal parts without accepting this second claim but, as we will see in section 8, most perdurantists do accept the second claim.
Unfortunately Grosseteste has little to say in support of this second claim, but his introduction of a distinct family of modal notions is of philosophical interest in its own right, as it marks an important stage in the development of modal theory.
Discriminative extinction training in Experiment 2 proved this second claim; the question is whether such training could have therapeutic effects beyond the paradigm.
This is the second claim to be lodged against RBS in the last few days.
A number of attempts to sue RBS have hit the buffers in the US, but this is the first claim to have been filed against the bank in the UK and others could join the action.
end{aligned} (53) This proves the first claim in (53).
This proves the first claim; the second one is an immediate corollary of the first.
In this example, the first claim addresses the issue whether the individual is decisionally capable.
