Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(15)
This test gives the differences between groups and the odds ratio (OR) for categorical outcome variables.
This test gives an overall indication that the model is performing well.
This test gives large volumes of high quality data on the soil conditions at the test location, which can be correlated to soil strength and stiffness parameters and used directly in pile capacity models.
It isn't just that this test gives the right result in many cases; it's also that the test fits nicely with the plausible view that an utterance of a sentence of the form 'A said that S' in a context C is true iff the content of S in C is the same as the content of what the referent of 'A' said (on the relevant occasion).
This test gives the exact probability of seeing a certain association between the two categorical variables by chance.
To keep these outliers from having major effects on statistical significance, we chose the Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon statistical test to compare survival times, because this test gives less weight to later events.
Similar(45)
The first rapid test used was the Determine™ HIV1/2 test, if this test gave a reactive result the SD Bioline HIV ½ 3.0 rapid test was performed, if this was not reactive, the Uni-Gold™ HIV test was used.
This test gave good sensitivity and specificity for detection of resistance to RIF, INH and MDR-TB but the overall performance was somewhat lower than for NRA, with kappa agreement for MDR-TB of 0.78 (Table 5).
As this test gave inconclusive results, data was analysed both using cross-species comparisons and taking phylogeny into account using generalised estimating equations as applied in the APE package in R. Irrespective of which method was used, we found a significant positive correlation between diet breadth and geographic range size.
This test gave no significant differences in chiasmata between the genotypes (p = 0.3365).
This test gave a typical band at the size of 104 bp suggesting that the existence of M.pneumoniae.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com