Sentence examples for this test figure from inspiring English sources

Compound 136 showed a limited effect in this test (Figure 2A), even at the highest tested concentration of 10 µM, when compared to 10 µM compound 106.

In this test, Figure 2 presents the behavior of (x_{n}) by choosing three different parameters in ({lambda_{n}^{(i)} }), that is, (b=2), (b=9), and (b= 100).

There was no effect of UL on the result in this test (Figure 2).

Since mice of the 129 genetic background are not very good responders in the plus maze test [27], as evidenced by the behavior of the Mecp2+/y-SC on this test (figure 3A), we decided to repeat this particular test on a B6129 F1 background.

B lymphoblasts from 8 control individuals were used for this test (Figures 4A and B).

rad6Δ strains are extremely sensitive to MMS, roughly 100X more sensitive than anc1Δ, so we used two sets of MMS doses to observe sensitivity in this epistasis test (Figures 3G and H).

To complete this test case, Figure 6 shows the activation potential time history at the cuboid centroid for a 350 ms simulation.

This is especially clear in the interaction on the Trails A test (figure 3).

This unfavourable prognosis proved to be statistically significant (P=0.026, log-rank test, Figure 4A).

Unpaired, one-tail t test (Figure 3), two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc testing (Figure 6C), and the paired t test (Figure 6D) were done using GraphPad Prism 4 software (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA).

This difference in survival rate was statistically significant (p = 0.0003) as was calculated with the Logrank test (figure 3B).