Sentence examples for this style of argument from inspiring English sources

This style of argument remains as unconvincing as when Darwin himself anticipated it.

This style of argument covers a wide variety of claims.

This style of argument can be successful when no other explanation can account for the truth of the premise.

This style of argument is familiar from other contexts: notably debates about the legalization of abortion, drugs, and prostitution.

This style of argument looks less promising, though, when looking at non-directed living kidney donation (to strangers).

They fail to correspond to any physical phenomenon along the diagonal so they fail to correspond to any physical phenomenon along the horizontal.[1] How does this style of argument compare to the Kripkean argument presented above?

McLaughlin (1984, 1995) calls this style of argumentation 'argument by appeal to a false implied supervenience thesis' or, for short, argument by appeal to a FIST.

The researchers found that the style of argument detected in the video sessions was a powerful predictor for a man or woman's risk for underlying heart disease.

But in all three cases, the style of argument is the same argument by appeal to a FIST.

It is a variation of the style of argument used by Justice Sanford in Whitney v. California.

It is not hard to see how, in principle, this style of coercion argument could work against organ sale.