Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
this study was funded by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"this study was funded by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are discussing a research project that has been funded by a particular source. For example, "This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health to investigate the long-term effects of air pollution."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Academia
Alternative expressions(10)
this research was supported by
financial support for this study was provided by
this work was financially supported by
this study was financed by
this work was funded by
this article was funded by
this project was funded by
this research was funded by
funding for this research was provided by
this research received funding from
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
This study was funded by Bayer.
Science & Research
This study was funded by Zoetis.
Science & Research
This study was funded by the University of Auckland.
Science & Research
This study was funded by deCODE genetics/AMGEN Inc.
Science & Research
This study was funded by AstraZeneca Nordic-Baltic.
Science & Research
This study was funded by The National Science Foundation.
Academia
This study was funded by AstraZeneca.
Science
This study was funded by Novo Nordisk.
Science
This study was funded by DINSE Stiftung.
Science
This study was funded by the authors.
This study was funded by BRAHMS - ThermoFischer.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always clearly state the funding source in academic papers and reports to ensure transparency and avoid potential conflicts of interest.
Common error
Avoid using vague language when specifying the funding source. Be precise and consistent with the official name of the funding organization or institution.
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "this study was funded by" serves as an explicit acknowledgment of financial support for a research project. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase clearly indicates the source that provided the resources necessary to conduct the study. It is commonly used in academic and scientific writing to ensure transparency and accountability.
Frequent in
Science
80%
Academia
20%
News & Media
0%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "this study was funded by" is a standard phrase used to acknowledge financial support in academic and scientific writing. As verified by Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct and widely accepted. The phrase is most commonly found in scientific publications and academic papers, ensuring transparency and proper attribution. For alternative phrasing, consider options like "this research was supported by" or "financial support for this study was provided by". When using the phrase, be precise with the official name of the funding source to avoid ambiguity.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
this research was supported by
Replaces 'study' with 'research' and 'funded' with 'supported', offering a more general term for the investigative work.
financial support for this study was provided by
Emphasizes the 'financial support' aspect, specifying that it was 'provided by' a certain entity.
this work was financially supported by
Substitutes 'study' with 'work' and uses 'financially supported' for a slightly different emphasis.
this investigation received funding from
Uses 'investigation' instead of 'study' and 'received funding' to vary the expression.
grants from supported this study
Highlights that the funding came in the form of 'grants' and reorders the sentence structure.
this project was financed by
Replaces 'study' with 'project' and 'funded' with 'financed', implying a more comprehensive financial backing.
this trial was funded by
Substitutes 'study' with 'trial,' indicating the research was conducted as a formal experiment.
the authors gratefully acknowledge the funding from
Shifts focus to the authors' acknowledgment of funding, adding a tone of gratitude.
the was the source of funding for this study
This construction inverts the typical structure, placing emphasis on the funding entity and their role.
this study benefited from a financial contribution by
Highlights the positive impact of the funding as a 'financial contribution'.
FAQs
How to use "this study was funded by" in a sentence?
Use "this study was funded by" to acknowledge the financial support that enabled the research. For example, "This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health to investigate the effects of climate change."
What can I say instead of "this study was funded by"?
You can use alternatives like "this research was supported by", "financial support for this study was provided by", or "this work was financially supported by" depending on the context.
Is it necessary to mention who funded a study?
Yes, mentioning the funding source is crucial for transparency and to disclose any potential conflicts of interest. It allows readers to assess the objectivity and reliability of the research.
What if a study was funded by multiple sources?
If a study was funded by multiple sources, list all of them. For example, "This study was funded by the National Science Foundation and the Department of Energy."
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested