Exact(2)
The final size of samples needed for this study was calculated at 77 in each group with setting of the effect size at 0.45, with a two-tailed level of α at 0.05, and value of β at 0.20.
An 18% difference in depression among mothers who deliver at term compared to mothers who deliver preterm was reported by Field et al., [ 29] and at a power of 80% and alpha level of 0·05, the estimated sample size for this study was calculated at 124 pregnant women.
Similar(58)
Prevalence of anaphylaxis in kindergarten and primary school children in this study is calculated at 1.5%%, which is within the range of comparable reports [ 17, 18].
The business tax rate for the study was calculated at 35percentt.
The nasal NO concentrations in this study were calculated as mean values, after measuring one nostril at a time.
The sample size of the randomised controlled trial of the HEADS study was calculated at 72 (36 in each arm), based on a significance level of 5%, a power of 90%, and a difference in mean improvement of at least 4 (SD 6) oblique diameter difference index points.
Moreover, differences between different raw materials and different pretreatments (The SF value of the pretreated wheat straw used in the present study was calculated at 3.58 (same as Jorgensen et al)., while Moreno et al. and presented a process of SF 3.34) make these processes difficult to control and to compare in many cases.
Sample size for this study was calculated in order to detect at least one infected animal with 95% confidence, assuming a 10% prevalence of an infection and close contact between age groups.
The sample size for this study was calculated by using single proportion formula at 95% confidence interval (CI) level (Z (1-ά/2) = 1.96), an expected prevalence of 50% since there was no study conducted regarding this topic in the area and 5% marginal error.
It should be noted that duration of RVO in the GENEVA studies was calculated at the baseline visit.
All statistics reported in this study were calculated using SPSS version 12.0 (Chicago, IL) at an α =.05.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com