Sentence examples for this stringent level from inspiring English sources

Furthermore, creating this stringent level of protection would discourage the FDA and other agencies from promulgating some speech regulations in the first place, because they would be unwilling or unable to bear the burden of defending the regulations in court against commercial speech challenges.

This stringent level required for consensus may account for the small number of items achieving consensus agreement after four rounds.

Even at this stringent level, it is clear that many of the considered PROSITE signatures (2 out of 8 in Table 3, and 9 out of 11 in Table 4) are over-represented compared to our homogeneous order 1 Markov background model.

This magnitude of change, as well as the stringent level for significance testing, argues against the presence of a type I error (spurious significant differences).

The possibility of the presence of a type I error is reduced by the stringent level for significance and the moderate effect sizes. a Items followed by an (R) were reverse-scored for analysis.

You may incorporate into the BART emission limit this more stringent level, which would serve as a contingency should the source continue operating more than 5 years after the date EPA approves the relevant SIP.

If this more stringent level were used, only one of the five ascribed Intercytoplasmic sperm injection, a variation on standard IVF.

At this more stringent level, 19 genes were differentially expressed at ZT3 and 13 at ZT15, while 4 genes were affected at both time points.

"The contamination can no longer be more than 0.5percentt," he said, referring to the stringent levels that China has imposed on some of the materials that it hasn't banned so far.

For replication purposes this leads to a less stringent level of statistical significance, and potentially to a higher likelihood of finding susceptibility variants.

Here, younger participants were more likely to support the use of prenatal testing (χ (2, N=200)=7.16, p=0.021; 50.5% vs 39.4%), although this result did not meet our stringent level of significance.