Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
This set of facts seems to me problematic.
Normally this set of facts portends trouble to come.
In response, the reductionist might either deny that legal facts are genuinely normative (in which case the sought-after reduction would be unproblematic), or she might assert that any successful reduction will have to reduce legal facts to a set of facts that includes normative facts (in which case a version of natural law theory might appear attractive).
In fact, this set of practices included all practices identified through the statistical aforementioned procedures.
This may be due to the fact that this set of cancer genes includes both oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes which are not expected to be co-expressed.
This set of codes does not include transient ischaemic attacks.
But given this new set of facts, how does the judge decide what the law is?
This is very important since it is not nearly so plausible that the moral supervenes on a set of facts that does not include the mental facts as if the wrongness of an action could float independently of facts about pain, intentions and beliefs.
This set of codes for 'acute stroke' included 121 codes.
This is a difficult set of facts to rationalize.
As always with this issue, the same set of facts produces very different interpretations.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com