Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
This question was considered by the IOM (2000) in the context of bird-related allergy.
Similar(59)
A second Latin phrase that can offer respite to business executives face with an ambiguous situation is "Cui Bono," or "Who stands to gain?" In judicial matters, this question is considered to help determine who may have committed a crime.
In other words, they answer the question "The future of what?" and indicate how important this question is considered to be.
This question is considered in detail below, after our discussion of the effects on GF amplitudes of sedimentary layers in the accretionary prism and in the onshore basin.
Participants answering "yes" to this question were considered to have engaged in sex work.
This question is considered indirectly in a few instances but not really adequately addressed.
Respondents that answered "yes" to this question were considered current smokers.
Participants who had an affirmative answer to this question were considered to have diagnosed diabetes; however, gestational diabetes mellitus was coded as "no" diabetes.
"Were the results of index tests interpreted without knowledge of each other?" The answers (Yes, No or Unclear) of this question were considered to help assessing the Risk of Bias of including studies.
A cylinder with a geometry that displayed the particular buckling pattern in question was considered for this study.
Any surveys in which a "no" response was chosen to this initial question were considered "unusable" since consent had not been given for participation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com