Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(57)
I'm not even sure this qualifies as thought.
This qualifies as crazy stuff out there.
In Greeneland this qualifies as wishful thinking.
I don't think this qualifies as "obsession".
"This qualifies as progress," Borchers wrote.
This qualifies as more walk than run.
This qualifies as political use of 9/11.
Most of this qualifies as superfluous but universal.
Similar(3)
So for me, this snake readily qualifies as beautiful.
Does this qualify as relatively permanent?
Would this qualify as (gasp) rationing?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com