The denominator for this prevalence, including all RhD-negative parae-1 who delivered their first child after introduction of antenatal anti-D-prophylaxis in the Netherlands, was calculated from National Birth Statistics (calculation described elsewhere).
Nonetheless, if we suppose that all the non-resident women are all clandestine and we recalculate the prevalence including only resident foreign women in the numerator we find that prevalence is significantly higher in this group than in Italian women.
Complete prevalence includes all cancer survivors, regardless of when they were diagnosed.
Reasons for this high prevalence include the inadequate knowledge of caregivers concerning correct infant and young child feeding, frequent infections worsened by bad hygiene, high population pressure, the low status of women and girls, and sub-optimal delivery of social services.
According to Reed [ 4], the reasons for this high prevalence include higher risk of arrest for people with mental disorders alleged to have offended, inadequate coverage by court assessment schemes, too few psychiatric beds, and poor identification of mental disorders during the prison reception process.
This post-treatment prevalence included patients with psychiatric co-morbidities including major depression.
Possible reasons for this age-related prevalence include incidence increases with exposure time, activation of latent virus increases with age, and possible previous exposure to transmission of MCPyV that is no longer in effect (11 ).
Potential causes of this variability in estimated prevalence include the use of different diagnostic criteria, diagnosis and management by variously trained medical professionals, and inconsistent diagnostic definitions.
The total prevalence (including pregnancy terminations) was 1.2 cases/10,000 registered births, and the birth prevalence (affected live births and stillbirths at >24 weeks' gestation) was 0.49 cases/10,000 births.
