Sentence examples for this outcome can be explained from inspiring English sources

This outcome can be explained by the latest findings that flotation responses (floatability, hydrophobicity, etc).

This outcome can be explained by the lower acquisition cost of frovatriptan, the need for fewer doses, and the loss of fewer working hours.

This outcome can be explained by relative p n junction in the graphene/SWCNTs contact caused by the work function difference at the contact area [11].

This outcome can be explained by a combination of the lower number of doses needed, on average, to treat a migraine attack, and the lower number of hours lost from the workplace when using frovatriptan.

The reason for this outcome can be explained as follows: On condition that adding the nitrogen volume moderate on the basis of stabilizing the quantity of foaming agent (from 1 1 to 2 1), the volume and quantity of foam would increase, triggering the improvement in foam stability and mobility control ability.

This outcome can be explained because normal growth of cells in culture already strongly relies on glycolytic metabolism [29] and therefore cannot be further promoted.

We then compute what fraction of the total variation in the outcome can be explained by each component of the model as well as the model as a whole.

The findings that the two information sources are significantly associated with the outcome can be explained in two ways: these sources are providing information that is either accurate or inaccurate.

When a measurement is associated with an outcome and it can be considered to come before the outcome (either logically or chronologically), it is often of interest to ask how much of the measurement's effect on the outcome can be explained via its effects on an intermediate variable.

This poor outcome can be explained by the baseline characteristics of the patient population: 29 patients (41.4%) were older than 50, 20 patients (28.6%) had a KPS of 60 or 70, 18 patients (25.7%) had just a biopsy, while only 7 patients (10%) got a gross tumor resection.

This difference in outcome can be explained by differences in the structure of the coating.