Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(15)
So whilst this objection has some teeth they are not sharp ones.
But this objection has a difficulty: Even if those experiences are good ones, would they be the ones I would want to trade for?
This objection has not generally been widely taken up.
This objection has a strong and a weak version.
This objection has both epistemological and ontological sides.
This objection has nothing to do with how much room central banks have to lower interest rates.
Similar(45)
Even if this objection had been sustained, the difficulty could have been easily obviated by amendment.
I'm embarrassed to admit that this objection had never occurred to me.
Some attempts to meet this objection have a paternalist ring.
Replies to this objection have been made by Seager (1994), Byrne (1997), and Rosenthal (2005), among others.
Various specific versions of this objection have been lodged, with varying degrees of forcefulness (by, e.g., Feldman 1999, 2001, 2004; Klein 2000, 2005; Kornblith 2000; Sosa 2000; Bach 2005), but they have in common the idea that EC, just because it is a semantic or meta-linguistic thesis, fails to successfully engage and respond to skepticism.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com