Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
This note corrects an error in the statement and proof of Propositions 9 and 10 of [C. Cross, Nonmonotonic inconsistency, Artificial Intelligence 149 (20032003) 161 178].
Similar(59)
Mr. Zimmerman went over to a piano and played the tune flawlessly with the note corrected.
In this note, we correct the proofs.
In this note, a correct mixed-integer linear programming model is proposed and the confusing blocking time is discussed.
In this note, we corrected some expressions obtained by Wang et al. [1].
In this note we correct the statement related to the regularity characterization of parameter functions and give some related new results.
In this note, we correct some mistakes in Theorem 2.1 and Theorem 2.2 which are given in Ref. [1].
In this note we correct Theorem 16 by adding the set of odd-cyclic atoms to the inputs of the computation, and argue that this change has no impact on the current applications of the theory of finitary programs.
In this note we correct some errors that appeared in the article (Huang and Xu in FixedPoint Theory Appl. 2013:112013013) by modifying some conditions in the main theorems andexamples.
In this note we correct some errors that appeared in the article (Abdeljawad in Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013:19, 2013) by modifying some conditions in the main theorems and by giving an example to support.
In this note we correct some errors that appeared in the article (Han and Xu in Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013 3, 2013) by modifying some conditions in the main theorems and corresponding corollaries.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com