Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(22)
Under this metric, does Bob Schieffer qualify?
This metric does not represent a percentage value [64].
Nevertheless, valuations remain below those peaks, so you might argue that this metric does not suggest immediate risk.
However, this metric does not affect the computational cost of ApproxMap.
This metric does not take any reconstruction characteristics (such as TOF information) into account.
While the absolute numbers certainly show Chicago has a massive problem on its hands, this metric does mitigate the risk factor to some extent, showing that many other large U.S. cities are far more violent.
Similar(38)
Extreme values of this metric do not necessarily indicate a problem with quality.
Because variations in genome size did not correlate with ITS1 lineage in T. rotula, this metric did not provide evidence for consistent barriers to interbreeding.
Even so, this metric did not systematically have larger chi-square statistics than the unweighted average, so it is difficult to argue that our results empirically support the population-weighted metric over the unweighted average.
But the concept of risk difference is potentially misleading in this context, as the metric does not refer to health risk, according to Charles Benbrook, research professor and program leader for Measure to Manage (M2M): Farm and Food Diagnostics for Sustainability and Health at Washington State University.
Currently, the metric does not consider different expectations of the end users toward privacy.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com