The limitations in the application of this method are due to the characteristics of the target: a very conductive fluid is usually contained in paths with dimensions that are much smaller than the depth at which it is located.
The choice of this method was due to the evidence shown by the literature that DXA is the main method for evaluation of bone mineral density.
The reason for this drawback of the method is due to the fact that Cα chemical shifts are a local property and, hence, our validation tool cannot be used to decide as to whether a topological arrangement is correct or not.
The choice of this particular method was due to the fact that we wanted to explore the dynamics created by participants in a peer setting where participants are more likely to share experiences, stories, memories, perceptions, wants and needs.
A commission assessment of alternative methods is due to report in early 2011, and a final decision will follow soon afterwards.
However, this method is limited due to the low air storage capacity.
Results showed that this method is efficient due to thermal comfort conditions.
