Don't discount the 'it's not what you know it's who you know' line This simple quote is often loosely thrown around, but it does not mean that the message is not important.
Sure, it's easy to tell Gmail that 'this message is not important' and strip its golden badge.
He contended that Obama's message wasn't important, since he believes most politicians will say anything to get elected.
This is not important to our message, which is a public-health one: headache disorders, without focus on migraine, are a major cause of population ill-health, representing a need for which health services must make due provision.
This doesn't mean that students are exposed to a null curriculum, where interprofessionalism is deliberately avoided in learning and teaching, and students are given the message that it is not important.
Controlling the message is not only important from a PR perspective, communication = trust in Web 2.0, silence, at least in direct communications with users, can often be viewed with suspicion.
That is what many think it is, but in actuality it sends the message that the call is not important enough to you to give it your full attention.
Failing to assess this knowledge sends an implicit message to learners that it is not important.
If you send out the message that the Twenty20 Cup is not important enough for the best English players, it's no wonder if fans take the hint and stay at home.
One message on Twitter read, "Political ideology is not important, he's a person and deserves respect, RIP Chávez".
This is incredibly hurtful to teens who ask for treatment and the message they get is their suffering is not important enough to treat.
