Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Various concentrations of Cu were impregnated on Fe doped ZnO that eventually turned into copper oxide and the photocatalytic activity of this material was compared with noble metal (Ag) impregnated on Fe doped ZnO.
This material was compared with data available from 54 other indigenous populations spread all over the world.
This material was compared to ITQ-17, a material with the same composition but only 12-MR pores, as well as zeolite Beta (3D 12-MR pores).
This material was compared to the tentative consensus sequence (TC) in the DFCI salmon gene index [ 28] that contained the EST from the same source clone as our reference sequence.
Similar(56)
The composition, structural characteristics and electrochemical behavior of this material were compared with the Pt1.0Cu/C catalyst based on the nanoparticles of a solid solution, which was obtained by the combined single-step chemical reduction of precursors, as well as with a commercial Pt/C sample with the same Pt-loading (20% by weight).
In all cases the correlation between any patient materials was always strongest when that material was compared to another patient material.
The flexural behaviour of RC beams strengthened using this new material was compared with RC beams strengthened with carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) sheet.
Since in this comparison, diploid (zygotic) and tetraploid (somatic) material was compared, we interpret only those data that were not among the homologues of genes differentially expressed in a comparison of diploid and tetraploid callus.
The microbial community distribution on each biocathode material was compared and four phylogenetic trees were constructed to characterize the relationship between those clone sequences.
The amount of coimmunoprecipitated material was compared to "input" after adjusting for volumetric differences in loading.
Plant material was compared with the Herbario Nacional Colombiano sample, registry number 333406 of August 12 de 1991.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com