Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(6)
Also for this line of arguments policy-makers and experts "filter" research findings (e.g., "neuroscience revealed," studies also indicate") to support their arguments for universal and mandatory ECE.
87See also for this line of arguments for example Heckman et al. (1999), Sianesi (2001), Kluve and Schmidt (2002), O'Connell (2002), Gerfin et al. (2005).
Following this line of arguments, it is implicitly stated that the correct functioning of regulatory networks resulting in the reproducibility and stability of developmental processes can be assumed to be embedded in regulatory schemes and encoded in control parameters, which represent substantial sources of epistasis.
This line of arguments supports the idea of a complex evolutionary history, in particular for lineage b.
2) Following on from this line of arguments, why did you use NIL-1, which contains the undesired downstream region, in your field experiments, rather than NIL-2, which apparently only contains FLC from Lov-1?
Consistent with this line of arguments, 34 of the 39 (87%) TF-binding loci embedded within transcriptionally active full-length L1HS retrotransposons (supplementary data set S4, Supplementary Material online) are occupied by NANOG, which is significantly more than expected by chance (P = 0.00086).
Similar(53)
This line of argument gets tangled.
Supporters of reparations find this line of argument irrelevant.
Tibetans tend to dismiss this line of argument as disingenuous.
(This line of argument strikes Slahi as "anything but reasonable").
But there are several problems with this line of argument.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com