The former simply refers to the standard definition of genetic robustness and is the one used in this article, whereas the latter refers to the average genetic robustness of all genotypes encoding a phenotype.
Hence the former refers to perceived risk, whereas the latter refers to actual risk of detection.
The former stresses the identity while the latter refers to the behavior.
However, the latter refers to external personal success and social status, as recognized by the social group.
The former refers to chaos, where its mathematical structure is regular, while the latter refers to one with a random mathematical structure.
The former idea refers to a physical complex, while the latter refers to a biological complex, and the two are authentically different complexes.
Thus, the former refers, implicitly, to a population-level phenomenon while the latter refers to individual-level phenomena.
Presumably the latter refers to a least significant difference test, but the former is ambiguous.
The former indicates participation in the NAS cohort at its inception and the latter refers to participation in KXRF measurements.
The former describes dental anxiety as a conditioned response whereas the latter refers to a constitutional vulnerability to anxiety disorders.
According to Lange, excuse clauses of this kind differ from cp-clauses as used in the sciences, because the latter refer to strategies of determining disturbing factors.
