Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(59)
Normalization of this kind can already be felt in Washington.
Propagandistic writing of this kind can be even more boring than it is irritating.
Processes of this kind can be useful in modeling seasonal or approximately periodic phenomena.
Views of this kind can be called realistic versions of anti-Platonism.
Only a cross-party consensus of this kind can achieve a new provincial finance law.
The revivalists reckon that cross-fertilisation of this kind can now start up all over again.
A solenoid of this kind can be made by wrapping some conducting wire tightly around a long hollow cylinder.
Cases of this kind can raise serious questions of whether a particular law, or the courts generally, are functioning well.
This second condition, however, need not be fulfilled; a science of this kind can be and commonly is entirely hypothetical.
Disagreements of this kind can be latched onto as evidence that the scientific process is flawed, fuelling the denial movement.
But solutions of this kind can only be arrived at with our own knowledge of our domestic set up.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com