Feinstein and other Senate Democrats can only attack this record by arguing that the interrogations yielded nothing new.
Some of the document's main findings included revelations that the CIA lied about the extent of its torture techniques, which included waterboarding, sleep deprivation and 'rectal feeding' of prisoners, and that the interrogations yielded no useful intelligence.
They maintain that the use of such interrogations yielded valuable intelligence and did indeed lead to the capture of bin Laden.
Moral considerations aside, nearly 10 years after 9/11 we have no reason to believe that these CIA interrogations yielded any additional actionable intelligence that kept us safer.
Moreover, no experimental determination of the 3D structure has yet been published and database interrogations yielded no hits with known 3 D structures (data not shown).
Tom Parker, a former officer for M.I.5, the British intelligence agency, who teaches at Yale, argued that, whether or not forceful interrogations yield accurate information from terrorist suspects, a larger problem is that many detainees "have nothing to tell".
The report indicates the CIA's interrogation programme yielded intelligence that led to the capture of other terrorist suspects and warned of terror plots against the US and elsewhere.
Officials said that the CIA's interrogation programme yielded little useful intelligence and was not helpful in the hunt for al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden or anything else of value.
The Times reported that the interrogations had yielded valuable intelligence, and that U.S. officials had hoped to keep the men's capture secret to give them time to pursue leads and launch raids on ISIS targets.
The F.B.I., which has had years of experience questioning suspects, has found that non-coercive interrogation methods yield more reliable results.
