But whether Jansons's interpretation stands up against the benchmark recordings of this huge work – conducted by Riccardo Chailly and Claudio Abbado – is another matter.
The radical-ascetic interpretation stands in constant tension with the positive understanding of Christian marriage.
Combined with the notion of decomposed processing of tens and units and the fact that the increased fMRI signal change for the left angular gyrus was present for both decreasing decade and decreasing unit sum the following interpretation stands to reason.
The Canadian pianist Glenn Gould famously preferred not to look back once he'd recorded a piece, so that interpretation stood.
The only possible interpretation: Stand By Your Brand.
But if you look at marriage in the United States over the past century, this interpretation doesn't stand up.
As it stands, this interpretation agrees with that given in the Huntington-Kline paper [12] when the partial ordering is total; but it does not define a basic ternary relation on (X) otherwise, as R2 clearly fails when there are incomparable elements.
Although we stand by this interpretation, we agree with the reviewers that more evidence is needed to confirm this possibility.
These interpretations stand in contrast to the prevailing view of much twentieth-century Kant scholarship that takes his account of religion to be at least skeptical of these doctrines or even to entail their denial.
This interpretation of events was endorsed at the time by Alvin Graves, who stood closest to Slotin when the accident occurred.
