The Carbon Tracker's interpretation is worth considering, if only because the State Department's FEIS used the group's methodology from previous studies in its own evaluation of the pipeline's production implications, though the government arrived at different conclusions.
That second interpretation was worth remembering this week, if only to assuage the awkwardness of watching New York's celebrity elite sweep up the carpet into the Ziegfeld cinema for the latest stage in the commercialisation of 9/11: the first feature film about the attacks.
Three types of analysis of theory interpretation are worth investigating: (i) a hierarchy of models (e.g., Suppes; Suppe), (ii) similarity (e.g., Giere; Weisberg), and (iii) isomorphism (e.g., van Fraassen; French and Ladyman).
The difficulty of ascertaining the objective worth of women's work, in this interpretation, is further complicated by issues of status and class.
This interpretation is wrong.
This interpretation is controversial.
This interpretation is too extreme.
This interpretation is debatable, though.
But this interpretation is not plausible.
This interpretation is necessarily partly conjectural, however.
