Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(9)
This difference can be considered a small one and in the range of the possible deviation in different batches.
If the accuracy difference between two experiments is bigger than the confidence interval, this difference can be considered significant with a 95% of probability.
In this paper, for all the experiments, the confidence interval is lower than 0.5%, so any difference higher than this value, this difference can be considered as significant with a 95% a probability.
This difference can be considered a "goal achievement gap".
According to Cohen [ 66], this difference can be considered as a weak effect.
This difference can be considered a "goal achievement gap" [ 3- 6].
Similar(51)
Although the increase of ZT is within the general error, since the values are those experimentally obtained, the difference can be considered to represent a tendency, at least indicating that the grain size control approach is promising.
When compared to the uniform reference, where the time stamps of all calls are drawn uniformly at random from the entire 6-month interval, it is seen that the growth of N ( t ) is slightly slower; however, for longer aggregation times, the difference can be considered negligible and thus the time-domain heterogeneities have a visible effect only for short time windows.
While the smartcard billing service had a larger unit cost than the traditional cash service, the difference can be considered relatively minor, and could be justified by taking into account the decrease in time and increased convenience.
The effects of these differences can be considered in the interpretation of our results.
However, to evaluate when a difference can be considered large enough, the standard deviation of the difference is not used.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com