Assuming ({mathbf b}), (bar{{mathbf b}} in C^1({{mathbb R}^{N}}, {{mathbb R}^{N}})) in addition to ({mathbf b}), (bar{{mathbf b}} in W^{1, infty }({{mathbb R}^{N}}, {{mathbb R}^{N}})) serves the single purpose that we can use the estimates of the preceding Lemma 42 for the comparisons specified in Proposition 46.
For this comparison, the NCS specified in Section 3.3 (with a non-switching controller) is used as reference.
To tackle this issue, in the ast.rnVSmm and other comparisons specified above, individual cell type comparisons are controlled against the average expression of all cell types in that species.
Other comparisons specified in the secondary variables were carried out similarly.
Pairwise comparisons, specified a priori, were performed using contrast statements from the model.
In all ANOVA models, if the omnibus F test revealed a significant difference, planned pairwise comparisons (specified in each relevant figure caption) were performed using Fisher's protected least significant difference method.
This comparison is used as an interference measure that [23] do not specify.
If so, we are required to specify how we should pick out and assess the relata in this comparison, which is trickier than it may at first appear.
This comparison is needed.
Further analysis into the logistic regression model for normal birth comparing Community 1 (105 mothers) and the reference group (1,013 mothers), i.e., yielding the largest sample size of 1,118, showed that we achieved a power of 74% to detect the odds ratio as statistically significant (assuming α = 0.05) for this outcome for the comparison groups specified.
