Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(60)
This comparison revealed only one statistically significant difference.
This comparison revealed that the choice of design is crucial.
This comparison revealed a good correlation coefficient of 87.09% for airflow distribution.
This comparison revealed that the new composite released heat more effectively.
This comparison revealed that large differences correspond with a large age range, which in turn indicates fuzzy cutoff dates.
This comparison revealed for the first time that the enzyme reaction was not significantly affected by the mild hydrogel encapsulation.
This comparison revealed issues that limited quantification and implementation of design intent and highlighted factors that constrained system optimisation.
This comparison revealed that the seed setting rate of ZH11 el1) was about 12%% lower than that of ZH11 (Additional file 6: Figure S6).
This comparison revealed that surface precipitates as Ni-rich LDH are not a dominant species during Ni sorption at pH 6.0 in the single sorbent system.
This comparison revealed the ability of the classification to provide a reasonable estimate of the number of triggered landslides and of the size of the affected area.
This comparison revealed that the model predictions provide a lower-bound estimate of the actual kinetics, primarily because of the assumption of a constant, steady state nucleation rate.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com