Suggestions(5)
Similar(60)
We have removed this specific comment concerning p21 protein expression in differentiated ESC.
This comment also concerns the numerical calculations presented below in this paper.
The present comment concerns some doubtful results included in the above paper.
My second comment concerns conscientious objectors.
A last comment concerns the transition seeds.
My last comment concerns the way in which communal goods are conceptualised by the authors.
A final comment concerns the total pain score and its sensitivity.
A final comment concerns the observation of HAMA in the group of CR patients with long-term survival.
My other comment concerns the proposed "superuniversality" of evolutionary potentials (ρ c ) of a individual functional categories.
My second comment concerns Amendment No 8, which seems to have been accepted but which I categorically reject.
Is this cause for comment, concern or celebration?
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com