Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Unfortunately, phenomenology is often mistaken to be synonymous with experience.2 Even if there is a weak sense in which this characterization is correct, it is nevertheless inaccurate.
Similar(59)
Given that Reid thinks that this initial characterization is correct, he regards this as a reductio of the Memory Theory.
I was amused this evening to catch a glimpse of a CNN show asking this question, as if either characterization is correct.
Johnson's characterization was correct, his historical judgment wrong; he underestimated the desperation of graduate students.
If that easy characterization were correct, Aristotle should have countenanced some type of entity corresponding to relatives as a highest kind.
The question of whether or in what sense these characterizations are correct is bound with the question of what is or should be our specific understanding of the ideas of modality and formality.[2] As we said above, it seems to be universally accepted that, in some sense or other, paradigmatic logical truths could not be false, or that they must be true.
This characterization is unfair.
This characterization is inaccurate.
This characterization is inadequate, however.
This characterization is woefully insufficient.
This characterization is vague, but deliberately so.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com