Sentence examples for this book assumes from inspiring English sources

(I leave out lawyers on the run and dystopian teens because Harbach, and everyone else in this book, assumes, correctly, that no one reading "MFA vs NYC" wants to be the next John Grisham or Suzanne Collins).

This book assumes the separation of call/session routing and signaling for call/session establishment from connection (or bearer-path) routing and signaling for bearer-channel establishment.

Interestingly, this book assumes that the SDK will be a completely different animal and separates this "open" hacking from officially sanctioned hacking.

Regarding the war on terror, the book assumes a very different character.

"In the small of your back?" The book assumes that readers grasp the contemptibly low stature of dolphins (along with barbed wire and rainbows) on the tattoo totem pole.

There's some strained humor in the early going, when Harbach seems unsure of his register, but once he settles into a mildly satiric mode of psychological realism — the mode of latter-day Jonathan Franzen, rather than the high turbulence of David Foster Wallace — the book assumes an attractive, and fitting, 19th-century stateliness.

However, the book assumes that the reader has some prior knowledge of patient set-up, immobilisation, and beam arrangement.

So I folded that up and continued research on the book, assuming I was going to have to write this book without Bernie Madoff.

Immediately, the book assumed the character of a new medium.

Shawcross's London publisher, Carmen Callil, had commissioned the book assuming that it would be as unflattering as Shawcross's book about Henry Kissinger's destruction of Cambodia, "Sideshow".

A political manifesto based on a sketchy reading of Cold War anti-totalitarianism, the book assumed definitive positions, even as they crumbled on the page.