Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Because MTC typically assumes that statistical heterogeneity is constant between different pair-wise treatment comparisons, one could contrast these measures of heterogeneity across the relevant treatment comparisons to get a sense of whether or not this assumption is tenable.
Similar(59)
In principle, the assumption is tenable, based on the observation that the ACh volley output and the overall EPSC amplitude and properties remain reasonably constant over time.
In complex sampling designs (incomplete block designs with several error strata, groups of possibly unbalanced experiments), one often performs mixed linear model analyses, when the normality assumption is tenable.
If the missing completely at random assumption is tenable, then analyses making use of available data will generally produce valid inferences.
While these assumptions are tenable in some settings, they are less appropriate for alcohol consumption.
This assumption is logically tenable as a 50%% inhibition of enzyme activity can be thought either as a case where 50% of the enzyme molecules are fully active while the rest is inactive to the alternative where every molecule is active only half the time.
Unfortunately, this assumption is rarely tenable for couple data [ 51].
However, if this assumption is not tenable, extensions based on mixture distributions (log-normal and binary) can be used and are also easily implementable in software [ 21].
The past 15 years of research on vaccines in low income countries, however, have shown that this assumption is not a tenable basis for vaccination policy 1 2 3 4; vaccines might have important non-specific effects.
In all these situations, provided the structuring assumptions are tenable, the analysis proceeds as in a density sampling case-control study wherein non-prevalent cases are proportional to respective person-time quantities and ultimately sustain an unbiased estimate of the IDR through the calculated cross-product ratio [ 30, 32].
This assumption is wrong.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com