Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
According to Zangwill this assumption is problematic, given that the obvious sensory and motor differences across species by themselves yield different cause-and-effect patterns at all but the grossest level of description.
But, as Sarah Stroud has argued (2010), this assumption is problematic, since there are cases of procrastination that do not fit with the traditional conception of weakness of will, which casts the agent as acting against her better judgment, or with the influential revisionary conception of weakness of will due to Richard Holton (1999), which casts the agent as acting irresolutely.
In this article, we think this assumption is problematic and, instead, assume that rational economic agents act as if they were maximizing their implicit utilities, which turns out to be a natural extension of the canonical rationality assumption.
However, this assumption is problematic [ 10].
However, this assumption is problematic if only sparse information about the inputs and few measurement points are available.
This assumption is problematic, since there are certain types of deaths which tend not to be reported by either network, for example deaths in early pregnancy.
Similar(51)
This latter assumption is problematic: according to [13], methodological issues have not been fully resolved regarding the potential underestimation of long-term variability in methods such as climate-field reconstruction or proxy scaling.
The assumption is problematic because it fails to consider the possibility of alternative mechanisms, such as a light-based magnetoreceptor in the beak., Nature is littered with examples of unexpected evolutionary adaptions which have confounded both prediction, and expectation.
Experimental evidence suggests that each of these assumptions is problematic and do not reflect the biological constraints and properties of viral replication.
Both of these assumptions are problematic and have been subject to feminist criticism.
We submit that both of these assumptions are problematic.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com