Sentence examples for this argument included from inspiring English sources

Some advocates of this argument included the president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Thomas Donohue, and Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan.

Those at the vanguard of this argument include Malcolm Gladwell in the New Yorker (Does Egypt Need Twitter?), the New Statesman's Laurie Penny (Revolts Don't Have to be Tweeted) and even David Kravets of Wired.co.uk (What's Fuelling Mideast protests? It's More Than Twitter).

Others who have deployed versions of this argument include Bales (1971), Brink (1989), and Pettit & Brennan (1986).

Common atheist responses to this argument include that unproven religious propositions deserve as much disbelief as all other unproven propositions, and that the unprovability of a god's existence does not imply equal probability of either possibility.

Evidence supporting this argument includes the fact that DNA sequence conservation associates less with HI than protein sequence conservation.

We agree with the reviewer and removed this argument (including citation Galarreta and Hestrin, 1998) from the Discussion.

Evidence for this argument includes the finding of fine scale population subdivisions within the CT [ 13- 18].

Evidence cited in favour of this argument includes the fall in forced vital capacity (FVC) on ascent to altitude [ 18]; changes in the phase III slope (the alveolar plateau) of the nitrogen washout curve [ 19, 20] and clinical, radiological [ 21, 22] and electrical impedance tomography [ 23] changes consistent with an increase in extra-vascular lung water, even in apparently asymptomatic subjects.

Scalia's counter-outburst was a notable contrast to the respectful tone of the rest of the argument, including from his fellow-conservatives.

He considers various objections to the argument, including ones from dreaming and from an unconscious desire to lose (to "throw" these matches).

Integrated pieces of the argument include, but are not limited to those listed in Table 2.