Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
This analysis is due by the end of October, when flight leaders have another meeting scheduled.
While this analysis is, due to the availability of data, necessarily at a relatively high level of aggregation and only covers a short period of time, our confidence in these findings is considerably increased by the large amount of qualitative data that corroborates our conclusions (see Appendix).
Similar(58)
Exclusions from this analysis were due to death (n = 7), withdrawal (n = 6), loss to follow up (n = 5), incomplete 36-month BSID-II (n = 39) due to administration errors, home-visit data unavailable (n = 1), or another reason (n = 1).
Therefore, although, we cannot rule out that a fraction of the differences observed in this analysis are due to the individual features of the vectors, these are unlikely to account for the majority of the large number of differences in enhancer activity observed in our study (this would imply that most published data for enhancer activity in mouse and zebrafish is also not reliable).
Further analysis is due out next month.
A full impact analysis is due to be published alongside a bill later this week.
It is worth noting that the trend observed in this substudy analysis was due to the larger number of events associated with a longer follow-up.
An I value of 25 50% is generally considered to be low to moderate, suggesting that there is a low to moderate probability that any variability in this meta-analysis is due to chance.
The significant benefit seen in this latest meta-analysis is due primarily to updated results from trials in Gothenburg and Malmo.
For liver studies, this analysis is complex due to the hepatocyte capability to dephosphorylate and release glucose and FDG into the blood.
In particular, the comparison to almotriptan with only 8 attacks included in this analysis is problematic due to statistical reasons (large confidence intervals etc).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com