Third-level performance of alternative policies Table 8 F-BEM Results.
Second-level performance of alternative policies Open image in new window Fig. 14 F-BEM Results.
First-level performance of alternative policies Open image in new window Fig. 13 F-BEM Results.
In the second level the performance of users is addressed.
As shown in Table 5, the efficient performance for the fuel consumption is obtained at the third level of gear 1 (4.23), second level of gear 2 (2), the fifth level of gear 3 (1.67) second level of gear 4 (0.97), the first level of gear 5 (0.65) and finally, the first level of differential gear (3.23).
In the same way the global weights of each performance evaluation item in the second level of physical performances represented in hierarchy structure of Fig. 2 can be calculated as 0.128, 0.033, 0.231, 0.052, 0.049, and 0.090, respectively.
And also, electrical resistivity, chloride permeability and alkali resistance in the second level of chemical performance are 0.081, 0.342 and 0.577 respectively.
Thus, the global weights of the second level of chemical performance are obtained as 0.034, 0.142 and 0.240 from Eq. (9) as shown below.
Based on this review, we conservatively evaluate the technological readiness level (TRL) for programmatic and industrial applications in high-temperature advanced reactors to be 7, "one-dimensional engineering-scale demonstration", or the first level in the proof-of-performance category.
With the method mentioned in step 2, the local weights of chemical and physical performance in the first level are calculated to be 0.417 and 0.583 respectively.
Furthermore, position specific networks, β-turn-P as described in materials and methods, were also trained in order to increase the predictive performance of the second level networks.
