Exact(3)
Isaiah Thomas was thinking: score a basket.
The results of the findings revealed student started with a mean critical thinking score of 41.32 and decreased at a rate of 0.42 over time, although not significant.
After controlling for individual characteristics, the final model revealed that the experimental group gained a higher critical thinking score across time than the control group.
Similar(57)
The authors' hypothesis was that the students' relational thinking scores would improve after having engaged in the mental mathematics activities.
Some support for this prediction can be taken from Dorfman [50] who showed that the greater a person's divergent thinking scores, the slower his or her reaction times were on a negative priming task requiring the inhibition of interfering information.
Analytical thinking scores were entered into a regression model that predicted productivity from BDI scores.
The introvert-high alexithymia (IHA) was characterized by a significant high score in difficulty identifying feelings and difficulty describing feelings, which referring to self emotional experience, but relative low score in externally oriented cognitive style of thinking scores.
Because a sub-optimal approach to decisions is likely to impact the productivity of decisions negatively, we conducted tests to determine whether the data were consistent with a hypothesis that Analytical thinking scores mediate the relationship between BDI scores and productivity scores.
First, a hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted using the 3 factors: difficulty identifying feelings; difficulty describing feelings; externally oriented cognitive style of thinking scores of TAS-20 as the clustering variables and the between-group linkage method with a squared Euclidean distance measure to discriminate clusters.
There was a statistically significant increase (t 91) = 2.254, P=0.027) in tree thinking scores (maximum score of 17) between the pre-TTCI and post-TTCI (Table 1).
We also ran Pearson's correlations among students' acceptance of evolution, the nature of their acceptance, and their tree thinking scores.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com