To help the right decisions to be made, my think tank, the Copenhagen Consensus Center, has asked more than sixty teams of top economists to assess some of the key targets which have been proposed and make a case for which should be part of the final list.
It is difficult questions like this that my think tank, the Copenhagen Consensus, is trying to answer.
This is what the my think tank, the Copenhagen Consensus has done with 60+ teams of top economists across education, hunger, energy, violence and now gender equality.
To do the most good, my think tank, the Copenhagen Consensus, has asked 60 teams of the world's top economists to look at the economic, social and environmental costs and benefits of all the top targets.
With the Copenhagen Consensus think tank, I asked 50 of the world's top economists where we could do the most good.
This is perhaps best captured in a recent state-of-the-art literature review by Professor Kym Anderson for the Copenhagen Consensus think tank.
There have been many, many critics of the work Lomborg does outside his Consensus Center think tank, much of which is published in newspaper columns.
This consensus [ 2] is the result of a Portuguese "think tank" of around 30 people chosen by a steering committee, with representation from the realms of science, clinical practice, health management, politics and patients.
That summit did not produce a bipartisan consensus on health care, and it showcased the president essentially chairing a Washington think tank seminar.
The think tank soon delivered.
We would suggest listening to Think Tank.
