Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "think participants" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to individuals who are engaged in a thought process or discussion, but it lacks clarity and context. Example: "In our brainstorming session, we need to encourage all think participants to share their ideas freely."
Exact(3)
This results in an intuitively plausible interpretation of B1, in that if we think participants are owed reciprocal benefits, it is because they have participated in risky research, and not in any specific trial.
However, when it comes time to tell the experimenter what they think, participants do not want to be taken as suggesting that the harm-causing protagonist is blameless, so they report that he acted intentionally.
For example, questions included those such as 'how do you think participants would distinguish between a user led approach and current care planning?' and 'what would you see as being the purpose of the user led care planning approach?'.
Similar(57)
"Teething maybe, build up of ear wax I think" (Participant 1) "I think in our children they have been water related.
GE thinks participants will be able to save 70% on their electricity bills: 30% by monitoring and adjusting their energy usage, and 40% by installing solar panels.
Focus groups can elucidate both what participants think and why participants think as they do [ 14].
"I don't think the participants should be sworn to secrecy," he said in a telephone interview from Bristol, England.
We eliminated really think because participants described feeling as though this questioned their honesty, which this had a negative connotation.
I don't care about how others think".(Participant I).
Similarly, it might be thought that participants in hypnosis become incapable of making conscious decisions.
They also thought that participants' best interests were rarely considered, reflecting gaps in communication and the decision-making process.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com