Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "think moreover" is not correct and is not commonly used in written English.
It seems to be an attempt to combine "think" with "moreover," which serves as a transition word to add information. Example: "I think moreover that we should consider the long-term effects of our decision."
Exact(3)
Think, moreover, of the everyday things which in 1897 had not been invented, or were yet to enjoy widespread use.
I think, moreover, that this works better with little sausages of the sort we British call cocktail sausages, or chipolatas; you can use breakfast sausage with equal success.
Few officials think, moreover, that any loans — even short-term ones — could be offered without a concrete deal with a government that has a mandate to impose the tough conditions that would be demanded in exchange.
Similar(57)
Ficino thought, moreover, that this whole pagan tradition could be reconciled with Christian and Jewish religion and accepted the view that Pythagoras was born of a Jewish father (Heninger 1974, 201).
Harewood and Pountney had been immovably opposed to surtitles; both believed that opera in English was pointless if it could not be understood; Harewood thought, moreover, that surtitles could undermine the case for a publicly funded opera-in-English company.
Whatever the cogito's inferential status, it is worth noting a twofold observation of Barry Stroud: "a thinker obviously could never be wrong in thinking 'I think'"; moreover, "no one who thinks could think falsely that he exists" (2008, 518).
Although not everything about this passage is perfectly clear, it does seem that Descartes gives a negative answer to the question whether machines can think; and, moreover, it seems that his giving this negative answer is tied to his confidence that no mere machine could pass The Turing Test: no mere machine could talk and act in the way in which adult human beings do.
The plan turns out to be even more regressive than I had thought, and, moreover, it is a "9-9-9" planame name only.
For instance, it applies only when the second-order judgment contains a "self-referential" mechanism, expressed in (W) by the phrase 'with this very thought'.[21] Moreover, the infallibility concerns occurrent judgments that attribute the co-occurrent first-order thought.
It is now known that this rule is not in fact as lax as historians had thought, and moreover that the rule is fully consistent with Gregory's style and mode of thought.
I tend to agree, and, moreover, think that is pretty much the bulwark philosophy of what I'm trying to do here.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com