Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

things were moving

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "things were moving" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where progress or change is occurring, often in a dynamic or evolving context. Example: "As the project deadline approached, it was clear that things were moving quickly, and we needed to adapt our strategy."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Things were moving fast.

News & Media

The Guardian

Things were moving too fast for them.

News & Media

The New York Times

On YouTube, things were moving faster.

We felt things were moving forward.

News & Media

The New York Times

"Ten years ago, we felt that things were moving.

News & Media

The New York Times

So it appeared that things were moving nicely.

"I think things were moving that direction," he said.

"Things were moving anyway, executive action [arrests] wasn't far off.

News & Media

The Guardian

But things were moving along in other respects.

News & Media

The New York Times

They did not believe things were moving forward as expected.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

But things are moving.

News & Media

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider the context to determine if "things were moving" is the most appropriate phrase. Sometimes, more specific vocabulary (e.g., "the project was advancing", "negotiations were progressing") can provide greater clarity.

Common error

While "things were moving" is grammatically sound, relying too heavily on passive constructions can make your writing sound vague or indirect. Aim for a balance with active voice where possible to add more punch.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "things were moving" primarily functions as a statement describing a situation in progress. Ludwig examples show it used to indicate that advancements, changes, or developments were taking place.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

98%

Formal & Business

1%

Science

1%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "things were moving" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to describe a state of progress or change. Ludwig confirms its acceptability and provides numerous examples from various sources, primarily in news and media. While the phrase is generally neutral in register, it's important to consider the specific context and choose more precise vocabulary when necessary to avoid vagueness. When writing, avoid overuse of passive voice and strive for a balance with active voice for a more impactful and engaging style. You can replace "things were moving" with alternatives such as "progress was being made" or "developments were underway" to fine-tune the intended nuance.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "things were moving" to sound more formal?

In formal contexts, consider using phrases like "progress was being made", "developments were underway", or "the situation was evolving".

What does it mean when someone says "things are moving in the right direction"?

It means that although the final goal hasn't been reached yet, progress is being made and positive outcomes are becoming more likely.

Is "things were moving" considered passive voice?

Yes, "things were moving" can be considered a passive construction because it emphasizes the action happening to "things" rather than who or what is causing the movement. Using a more direct, active voice can often improve clarity.

What's the difference between "things were moving fast" and "things were moving quickly"?

While both phrases convey rapid progress, "things were moving fast" is slightly more informal and emphasizes speed in a general sense. "things were moving quickly" is more formal and emphasizes the efficiency and speed of the action itself.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: