Suggestions(1)
Exact(4)
On the Securitas website, there is an article entitled "To outsource or not to outsource?", calling on police and crime commissioners to privatise more police functions: "The view held by some that outsourcing is more expensive than running things in house is simply not so when private security companies are able to pay their staff a lower rate".
In fact, it has always been the England way to keep things in house: the first coach/manager was Micky Stewart, and he was followed by Keith Fletcher and Raymond Illingworth, before David Lloyd became what was more realistically recognised as a head coach.
It seems like the company did one better by keeping things in house and completely re-doing it all.
As Ase put it, there's sometimes a desire to "keep things in house" in the black community.
Similar(56)
Too often the response is to manage things "in-house".
Sometimes it's better and cheaper to do things in-house.
"We are trying to make things in-house instead of outsourcing them".
Effective as outsourcing can be, doing things in-house is often easier and quicker.
Unlike firms in other businesses, Big Pharma still does most things in-house, from research to manufacturing, sales and distribution.
The strategy now involves "building things in-house and placing a lot of bets," Ms. Schiller said.
The tax's predecessor encouraged firms to do things in-house to minimise the number of transactions subject to BT.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com