things has changed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "things has changed" is not correct in English.
It should be "things have changed." You can use the corrected phrase when indicating that multiple aspects or situations have undergone a transformation or alteration. Example: "Over the years, things have changed significantly in our community, leading to new opportunities for growth."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

"The whole order of things has changed".

The New York Times

The way I look at things has changed.

The New York Times

But since September's collision with the fuel protests, the scheme of things has changed.

The Economist

None of these things has changed at all by the end, even though you've been sitting there for two and a half hours.

The Guardian - Film

And whether we remember or use everything we crammed into our brains for a single score, the act of studying those things has changed us and, quite possibly, led us to the careers in which we find ourselves many years later.

The Guardian - Opinion

This focus on things has changed, as product designers begin to explicitly emphasize both short-term and long-term interactions with the artifacts they make.

Thoughts on Interaction Design

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

Indeed, things have changed.

Independent

Somehow, things have changed.

The Economist

Some things have changed.

The New York Times

Alas, things have changed.

The Economist

But things have changed.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the correct verb conjugation: "things have changed" when referring to multiple items or aspects.

Common error

Avoid using singular verb forms like "has" with plural subjects like "things". Remember that "things" is plural and requires the plural verb form "have".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "things has changed" attempts to express a transformation or alteration. However, it is grammatically incorrect. According to Ludwig, the correct phrasing is "things have changed."

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "things has changed" is grammatically incorrect; the correct form is "things have changed". As Ludwig AI highlights, the plural subject “things” requires the plural verb “have”. Although found in some sources, primarily News & Media, its use constitutes an error. When you want to convey the idea of transformation or evolution, it's best to use grammatically correct alternatives such as "circumstances have shifted" or "situations have evolved".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

circumstances have shifted

Replaces general "things" with a more specific "circumstances" and corrects the verb conjugation.

situations have evolved

Uses "situations" instead of "things" and employs "evolved" for a sense of gradual change, while correcting verb conjugation.

the landscape has altered

Employs "landscape" metaphorically to represent the overall context, with correct verb conjugation.

times have changed

Focuses on the passage of "time" as the agent of change, correcting the verb conjugation.

the order has been revised

Highlights the correction of an "order", with passive voice and accurate verb conjugation.

events have unfolded

Uses "events" to replace "things" and suggests a natural progression of change, correcting verb conjugation.

developments have occurred

Replaces "things" with "developments" and indicates change through occurrence, correcting verb conjugation.

the situation has transformed

Emphasizes a complete change of the initial "situation", with proper verb conjugation.

conditions have varied

Highlights the diversity of "conditions", indicating that change has occurred over time and correcting verb conjugation.

affairs have progressed

Uses "affairs" to replace "things" and indicates a forward movement or evolution, with proper verb conjugation.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "things has changed"?

The grammatically correct way to express this idea is "things have changed". The subject "things" is plural, so it requires the plural verb form "have".

When should I use "things have changed"?

Use "things have changed" when you want to indicate that a situation, environment, or set of circumstances has undergone a transformation or alteration over time.

What are some alternatives to saying "things have changed"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "circumstances have shifted", "situations have evolved", or "times have changed".

Is "things has changed" ever correct?

No, "things has changed" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrasing is "things have changed". The verb "have" agrees with the plural subject "things".