Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(12)
The resolution of the thickness readings is not constant because of the shape of the inner gauge.
Nevertheless, compaction due to loading may contribute to a variable error in thickness readings and cannot be avoided.
These results show a good relative resolution (< 10percentt) for the thickness readings and the bulk densities.
From 64 thickness readings, only 9 measurements have a real error exceeding the theoretical resolution of the instrument.
The ashmeters installed at this time (first generation) had a range of 0.3 – 10 mm and a resolution for thickness readings twice lower than the current model (fifth generation) used for the resolution calculation presented in the Additional file2.
Thickness readings were possible in 3 of the 7 ashmeters because the deposits were ≥ 0.3 mm thick (the threshold of the ashmeter); all others were too thin to record so only area density could be calculated for those stations.
Similar(48)
However, previous studies have indicated that SPAD values may sometimes reflect variation in leaf thickness, because the readings are based on the leaf chlorophyll's absorption of specific spectral bands of light, which may be influenced by leaf thickness (Peng et al. 1993; Jinwen et al. 2009).
The measurements recorded include salinity, current, temperature and ice-thickness data, including readings for the period when the 2010 ice island passed through.
▪ Abnormal GDx RNFL average thickness/ standard deviation/superior thickness/inferior thickness measures (1 reading at p<0.5% or 2 readings p<1% or 3 readings p<2%).
Quantitative results of the in-vivo tests (skin fold thickness increase and OD readings) and bacteriology were recorded and linked with the individual identity of each animal.
▪ IOP >21 mm Hg AND either an abnormal HRT II Moorfields Regression Analysis (at least two sectors borderline ) or abnormal GDx RNFL average thickness/standard deviation/superior thickness/inferior thickness measures (any two readings p<5%).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com