Sentence examples for thickness of fracture from inspiring English sources
Using welltest permeability and image log fracture spacing and aperture, by considering average permeability based on the thickness of fracture and matrix layers, the proposed method can provide reliable first guess estimation of average fracture permeability for reservoir simulation studies.
The model is applied to evaluate the effect of adhesive thickness on fracture characterization of adhesive joints.
Focuses are given to addressing the influence of the coating thickness on fracture resistance of the zinc iron intermetallic layers of galvanized coatings that are subjected to four-point bending.
The effect of inter-later type and thickness on fracture pattern of LG samples, fragment size, maximum deformation (MD), maximum equivalent stress (MES), maximum equivalent principal strain (MPES) is also discussed.
Open image in new window Fig. 9 Influence law of reservoir thickness on fracture propagation Open image in new window Fig. 10 Influence law of reservoir thickness on fracture propagation.
Then, the effect of UNCD thickness on fracture strength and thermal conductivity was studied using the test samples with thin layers of UNCD having thicknesses of 1, 2.5, 5, and 10 μm on 100 μm thick PCD films, respectively.
The experimental results demonstrated the thickness dependence of fracture and damage.
Results show that hydraulic fracture crossing/diverting behavior depends on the approach angle, the rock−cement interfacial bond strength, and the thickness of natural fracture.
The thickness of the fracture zones in the footwall is variable, ranging between 12 m and 39.9 m.
Combining this law with the Darcy's law yields (Committee on Fracture Characterization and Fluid Flow, National Research Council 1996): b={left(12times {T}_fright)}^{frac{1}{3}} (7 where T f is the transmissivity (m3), and b the thickness of the fracture plane (m).
It is notable that the thickness of the fracture zones in the sandstone-dominant intervals (2.7 to 5.5 m) is smaller than that observed in the shale-dominant intervals (2.3 to 18.6 m) (Figure 4).
