Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
they were known
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "they were known" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to the reputation or recognition of a person or group in a specific context. Example: "In the art community, they were known for their innovative techniques and unique style."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Science
Alternative expressions(20)
they were recognized
they were acknowledged
they were recognised
they were identified as
they were regarded as
they were considered
they were seen as
they were informed
they were ascertained
they were appreciated
they were understood
they were popular
they were information
they become known
they were emitted
they were required
they were requested
they were elected
they were ranked
they received instructions
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
50 human-written examples
So they were known".
News & Media
They were known as the "Rough Riders".
News & Media
They were known as giudei (Jews).
News & Media
(They were known as the Black Poor).
Encyclopedias
They were known as the Wolf Brigade.
News & Media
They were known by different letters.
News & Media
They were known as The Boys.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
4 human-written examples
They are known as blockbusters.
News & Media
They're known to be violent.
News & Media
They are known for living well.
News & Media
They are known as "interpreted" languages.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When employing "they were known", ensure that the subsequent description aligns with the historical context and available evidence.
Common error
Avoid using "they were known" when referring to a future or ongoing state. Use "they are known" instead if the subjects are still known by that name or description.
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "they were known" functions as a passive construction, indicating how a group or entity was perceived or identified in the past. Ludwig examples show it describing past reputations, names, or characteristics.
Frequent in
News & Media
72%
Encyclopedias
14%
Science
6%
Less common in
Formal & Business
2%
Wiki
2%
Social Media
2%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "they were known" is a common and grammatically sound construction used to describe past perceptions or identities. Ludwig examples demonstrate its wide application across various domains, particularly in news and media, encyclopedias, and science. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is generally considered correct and its alternatives include "they were recognised" or "they were identified as", each offering slight nuances in meaning. When writing, ensure that the tense aligns with the historical context and be mindful of potential errors like applying the phrase to future or ongoing states.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
they were recognised
Interchangeable in contexts where acknowledgment or formal recognition is implied.
they were identified as
Focuses on the act of identification or classification.
they were called
A simpler and more direct way of indicating a name or label.
they were regarded as
Emphasizes a particular opinion or viewpoint held about them.
they were considered
Similar to 'regarded as', but can also imply a more thoughtful or deliberate assessment.
they had a reputation for
Highlights the established reputation or notoriety of the subjects.
they were famous for
Indicates widespread fame or recognition for a specific attribute or achievement.
they were noted for
Similar to 'famous for', but can also imply a more specific or noteworthy characteristic.
they were understood as
Focuses on the common understanding or interpretation of their actions or qualities.
they were seen as
Describes the perception or image that others had of them.
FAQs
How can I use "they were known" in a sentence?
"They were known" is used to describe the past reputation or identification of a group or entity. For example, "In the 1980s, "they were known as leveraged buyout shops"."
What are some alternatives to "they were known"?
Alternatives include phrases like "they were recognised", "they were identified as", or "they were called", depending on the specific context.
Is it correct to say "they are known" instead of "they were known"?
Whether you should use "they are known" or "they were known" depends on the timeframe you're referring to. Use "they were known" when discussing a past reputation or identity, and "they are known" if it's current.
What's the difference between "they were known as" and "they were famous for"?
"They were known as" is a more general phrase indicating a name or label, while "they were famous for" implies widespread recognition for a specific achievement or characteristic.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested