Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
they were indicted
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "they were indicted" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal contexts to indicate that individuals have been formally charged with a crime by a grand jury. Example: "After a lengthy investigation, they were indicted on multiple counts of fraud."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
He said Mr. Dillon had "revolutionized" the county's justice system by allowing felons to plead guilty before they were indicted, while eliminating most post-indictment plea bargains.
News & Media
In reply they were indicted and tried for sedition.
Academia
(They were indicted on multiple charges and acquitted).
News & Media
A year after the sting they were indicted.
News & Media
The three men all resigned before they were indicted.
News & Media
When they were indicted, it spelt the end for them".
News & Media
The defendants, all white men, pleaded not guilty after they were indicted in October 2016.
News & Media
They were indicted on Tuesday and are to be arraigned today.
News & Media
They were indicted on bribery charges and scorned for embarrassing the city.
News & Media
But industry records show that both men stayed at the firm long after they were indicted.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
1 human-written examples
They were -- indicted.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
To ensure clarity in your writing, always specify the charges following the phrase "they were indicted" to provide a complete picture of the legal situation.
Common error
Avoid using "they were indicted" as if it means "they were found guilty". An indictment is merely a formal accusation; it doesn't indicate guilt or innocence. The individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in court.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "they were indicted" functions as a passive construction, indicating that individuals have been formally accused of a crime by a grand jury. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage in various contexts.
Frequent in
News & Media
75%
Academia
15%
Wiki
5%
Less common in
Science
2%
Formal & Business
2%
Encyclopedias
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "they were indicted" is a grammatically correct and very common phrase used to indicate that individuals have been formally accused of a crime by a grand jury. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is most frequently found in News & Media and Academic contexts. When writing, remember that indictment is not a conviction; it is merely a formal accusation. For alternative phrasing, consider options like "they faced charges" or "they were charged with", depending on the desired nuance. Ludwig's analysis underscores the importance of using this phrase accurately and appropriately in both formal and informal contexts.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
they were charged with
A direct and commonly used alternative that focuses on the specific charges.
they faced charges
Simplifies the phrase by using 'faced' instead of 'were indicted'.
they were formally accused
Substitutes 'indicted' with 'formally accused', emphasizing the formal nature of the accusation.
charges were filed against them
Rephrases the action to focus on the filing of charges rather than the indictment itself.
an indictment was issued against them
Changes the sentence structure to highlight the issuance of the indictment.
they stood accused
Uses a more literary and slightly less formal construction.
they were arraigned
Focuses on the arraignment process, a specific legal step.
they were prosecuted
Highlights the act of being prosecuted, the legal proceedings that follow an indictment.
legal proceedings were initiated against them
Replaces 'indicted' with a broader term referring to the start of legal action.
they were booked on charges
More colloquial and implies arrest and formal recording of charges.
FAQs
What does "they were indicted" mean in legal terms?
In legal terminology, "they were indicted" signifies that a grand jury has determined there is enough evidence to formally accuse someone of a crime. It's a preliminary step and does not imply guilt.
What can I say instead of "they were indicted"?
You can use alternatives like "they faced charges", "they were formally accused", or "charges were filed against them", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
What is the difference between "they were indicted" and "they were convicted"?
"They were indicted" means someone has been formally accused of a crime by a grand jury. "They were convicted" means they have been found guilty of the crime after a trial or plea. Indictment precedes conviction.
Is it appropriate to use "they were indicted" in informal writing?
While grammatically correct, "they were indicted" is more formal and often used in legal or journalistic contexts. In informal writing, phrases like "they were charged with" might be more suitable.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested