Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
they were identified
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "they were identified" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the process of recognizing or naming individuals or items in a specific context. Example: "After thorough investigation, they were identified as the main suspects in the case."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Alternative expressions(15)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
56 human-written examples
They were identified as Sgts.
News & Media
They were identified only as a "U.N.
News & Media
Like celebrity actors, they were identified with certain roles.
News & Media
They were identified as Hideki Hashimoto, Nobuhiro Kurosaki and Hiroshi Tanaka.
News & Media
They were identified as Dashorn Washington and Jamel Robinson, both of East New York.
News & Media
They were identified by relatives, said the Westchester County medical examiner, Millard J. Hyland.
News & Media
They were identified in testimony as having discussed increasing buyers' fees in 1992.
News & Media
They were identified as Michael Edwards, 24; Vanessa Quinones, 20; and Clem Clemmons, 40.
News & Media
They were identified as Sarah Blaustein, 53, and Esther Alvan, 20.
News & Media
They were identified as Jeffrey Edmonson, 23, Brian Mahanna, 21, and Micah Lasher, 22.
News & Media
In addition to nationality, they were identified by "race or people" and by complexion.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
In reports or formal documents, follow "they were identified" with specific details about the method of identification, such as "through DNA analysis" or "by eyewitness testimony".
Common error
Avoid overuse of passive constructions like "they were identified" if it obscures who performed the identification. Whenever possible, rephrase to use active voice for clearer and more direct writing, such as "Investigators identified them" instead of "They were identified by investigators".
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The primary grammatical function of the phrase "they were identified" is as a passive voice construction. It indicates that the subject (they) underwent the action of being identified, typically by an unstated or subsequently mentioned agent. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and wide usage.
Frequent in
News & Media
51%
Science
47%
Wiki
1%
Less common in
Formal & Business
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "they were identified" is a grammatically correct and widely used passive construction that serves to report the recognition or naming of a group or individuals. As supported by Ludwig AI, its frequency is very common across diverse contexts like News & Media and Science, reflecting its utility in objective reporting. While its register is generally neutral, writers should be mindful of clarity and directness, considering active voice alternatives when appropriate. Avoiding overuse and ensuring clear context will enhance the effectiveness of this phrase in written communication.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
they were recognized
Focuses on the act of acknowledging or knowing something or someone previously encountered.
their identities were established
Emphasizes the process of confirming who they are, often through formal means.
they were singled out
Highlights being chosen from a group, implying a specific reason for selection.
they were determined
Indicates a conclusion or decision was reached about their identity or role.
they were pinpointed
Suggests a precise and accurate identification, often after investigation.
they were ascertained
Implies a formal or official process of finding something out for certain.
they were classified
Focuses on categorization or grouping based on shared characteristics.
they were designated
Highlights the act of officially assigning a role or identity.
they were discerned
Emphasizes the ability to perceive or recognize something not immediately obvious.
they were tagged
Suggests a label or identifier was attached, either literally or figuratively.
FAQs
How can I use "they were identified" in a sentence?
Use "they were identified" to indicate that a group or individuals have been recognized or named. For example, "They were identified as the primary suspects in the investigation".
What are some alternatives to "they were identified"?
You can use alternatives like "they were recognized", "their identities were established", or "they were singled out" depending on the specific context.
Is it better to use active or passive voice with "they were identified"?
While "they were identified" (passive voice) is grammatically correct, using the active voice (e.g., "investigators identified them") can often make your writing clearer and more direct. Choose the voice that best suits the context and your intended emphasis.
What does "they were identified" mean?
The phrase "they were identified" means that a group of people or items have been recognized, named, or classified after a process of discovery or investigation.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested