Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
they were identical
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "they were identical" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe two or more items, people, or concepts that are exactly the same in appearance, characteristics, or qualities. Example: "The twins were so alike that many people often remarked that they were identical."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
They were identical twins but didn't photograph identically.
News & Media
However, with exception of a single patient, patients understood both wordings of the scale, thought they were identical, and could answer the question identically with either response scale.
They were identical.
News & Media
ber's formula with Einstein's, showing that they were identical.
Academia
If they were identical, you wouldn't need them both".
News & Media
"Yet for too long government policy has treated every place as if they were identical.
News & Media
It charged twice the price of the regular packets of Nurofen but they were identical products.
News & Media
He examined both under the microscope: good, they were identical; he could leave in tranquillity.
News & Media
Then she studied both signatures, to make sure that they were identical.
News & Media
These two views, precisely because they were identical, were totally incompatible.
Encyclopedias
All participants then viewed new geometric pairs and indicated whether they were identical or different.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "they were identical" to emphasize that there are no discernible differences between the subjects being compared. This phrase is suitable for both formal and informal contexts.
Common error
Avoid using "they were identical" when describing things that are merely very similar. Reserve it for situations where the subjects are truly indistinguishable in all relevant aspects. Use alternatives like "they were similar" or "they were alike" for less precise comparisons.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "they were identical" functions as a descriptive statement. It asserts a complete equivalence between two or more entities. Ludwig AI confirms its usability and correctness. Examples from Ludwig illustrate its use in scientific, news, and general contexts.
Frequent in
Science
54%
News & Media
37%
Encyclopedias
5%
Less common in
Wiki
3%
Formal & Business
1%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "they were identical" is a common and grammatically correct way to express that two or more entities are exactly the same. As shown by Ludwig, it is widely used in various contexts, including science, news, and general writing. While versatile, it's crucial to reserve its use for scenarios where the entities are truly indistinguishable, avoiding overuse for mere similarity. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is a good choice for writers. Alternatives like "they were the same" or "they were indistinguishable" can be used to add variety or nuanced meaning.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
they were the same
Simple substitution of 'identical' with 'same', maintaining the core meaning of equivalence.
they were indistinguishable
Emphasizes the difficulty in discerning any differences between the subjects.
they were alike
A more general term for similarity, but in some contexts can imply near-identity.
they were equivalent
Highlights functional or qualitative equivalence rather than just appearance.
they matched perfectly
Suggests a precise correspondence or alignment.
they were carbon copies
Implies an exact reproduction or imitation.
they were duplicates
Indicates that one is an exact copy of the other.
they were uniform
Focuses on the lack of variation within a group.
they corresponded exactly
Stresses a precise agreement or parallel.
they mirrored each other
Suggests a reflection of one in the other, implying strong similarity.
FAQs
What does "they were identical" mean?
The phrase "they were identical" means that two or more things are exactly the same, with no discernible differences between them.
When is it appropriate to use the phrase "they were identical"?
Use "they were identical" when you want to emphasize that there are no differences between two or more things. It's best suited for situations where the subjects are truly indistinguishable.
What are some alternatives to saying "they were identical"?
Alternatives include phrases like "they were the same", "they were indistinguishable", or "they were alike", depending on the context.
Is "they were identical" formal or informal?
"They were identical" can be used in both formal and informal contexts. Its appropriateness depends more on the specific subject matter than the setting.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested