Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
they were chosen
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The sentence 'they were chosen' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it if you want to describe someone being selected, typically for a task or an honor. For example, "The team held tryouts and four players were chosen to join the squad."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Science
Alternative expressions(19)
they were selected
they were picked
they were designated
they were appointed
they were elected
they were preferred
they were identified
they were checked
they were decided
they were disclosed
they were composed
they were closed
they were specified
they were exercised
they were determined
they were recognised
they were used
they were organised
they were nominated
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
They were chosen because I.Q.
News & Media
They were chosen to draw young audiences.
News & Media
They were chosen from 6,300 applicants.
News & Media
Students learned Friday whether they were chosen.
News & Media
They were chosen because they were rare".
News & Media
They were chosen around the time of independence in 1968.
Academia
They were chosen from nearly 3,000 applications submitted.
Academia
They were chosen on reputation and size this year.
News & Media
They were chosen from 71 scientists who were nominated for the honor by their respective institutions.
Academia
They were chosen to represent a wide variety of image types, e.g., indoor, outdoor, portraits, etc.
Academia
They were chosen for their good character and revolutionary attitude and deeds.
Academia
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "they were chosen", ensure the context clearly indicates the criteria or reasons for their selection. This adds clarity and strengthens the statement.
Common error
Avoid using "they were chosen" without specifying the selecting body or the basis for their selection. For instance, instead of saying "they were chosen", specify "they were chosen by the committee for their experience."
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "they were chosen" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject (they) underwent the action of being selected by an unspecified or previously mentioned agent. This is confirmed by Ludwig AI, which identifies it as correct and usable in written English.
Frequent in
News & Media
38%
Academia
30%
Science
27%
Less common in
Formal & Business
3%
Encyclopedias
1%
Wiki
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "they were chosen" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed passive construction used to express that a group or individuals have been selected. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and wide applicability. As shown across a variety of sources like The New York Times, The Guardian, and academic institutions, it's commonly found in news, academic writing, and scientific publications. For improved clarity, it's best practice to specify the selector and the criteria used. Alternatives such as "they were selected" and "they were picked" can be used depending on the context and desired level of formality.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
they were selected
Replaces "chosen" with a direct synonym, emphasizing the act of picking out from a group. /s/they+were+selected
they were picked
Uses a more informal synonym for "chosen", suggesting a less formal selection process. /s/they+were+picked
they were designated
Emphasizes the assignment of a specific role or purpose. /s/they+were+designated
they were appointed
Indicates a formal selection, often for an official position. /s/they+were+appointed
they were elected
Specifies selection through a voting process. /s/they+were+elected
they were named
Focuses on the act of giving a title or designation. /s/they+were+named
they were favored
Suggests a preference or bias in the selection. /s/they+were+favored
they were preferred
Indicates that they were chosen because they were liked more than others. /s/they+were+preferred
they were identified
Highlights the recognition or discovery of suitable candidates. /s/they+were+identified
they were admitted
Used when the selection involves entry into a group or institution. /s/they+were+admitted
FAQs
How can I use "they were chosen" in a sentence?
Use "they were chosen" to indicate that a group was selected from a larger pool, often for a specific reason. For example, "They were chosen for their exceptional skills".
What's a more formal alternative to "they were chosen"?
A more formal alternative is "they were selected", which carries a similar meaning but sounds more sophisticated.
Is it always necessary to specify why "they were chosen"?
While not always grammatically required, specifying the reason for selection provides valuable context and makes your writing clearer and more informative. Omit the reason only when it's self-evident or intentionally left ambiguous.
How does "they were chosen" differ from "they chose"?
"They were chosen" indicates a passive construction, meaning someone else did the choosing. "They chose" is an active construction, meaning they themselves made a choice. For example, "They were chosen by the manager" versus "They chose to participate".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested